Sherry Turkle’s opinion is that with all the technological
advances there is one great thing that was lost, conversation. Turkle’s claim
is that technology is so heavily routed in our lives that we are losing the
basic connection of conversation. She explains it well in the following
statement.
“We used to think, ‘I have a feeling; I want to make a call.’
Now our impulse is, ‘I want to have a feeling; I need to send a text.’” Turkle
does not state that technology should be eliminated but that we as humans
should take steps to make room for conversation by creating sacred spaces such
as the kitchen, the dining room, or cars “device-free zones.
I believe Turkle does not challenge Wesch’s call for digital
community and connection since she never states to completely get rid of
technology. She simply states that conversation should be held at a high standard
and that we should pull ourselves away from our devices and make connections
face to face with people. I feel Wesch’s claim was geared toward educational
reform where as Turkle does not mention education besides being at the library
at a college level where everyone is in their own little world. We should keep
our heads up and take advantage of what is around us in nature and take
advantage of one another and have conversations.
I agree Liz with your conclusion that Turkle does not challenge Wesch. I think they are looking at social media in different ways that are not necessarily opposing, just different, if that makes any sense : )
ReplyDelete